I was in a van along with 4 other pissed-off customers, being driven to an Enterprise location 15 miles across the San Fernando Valley. I had just dropped off my Saab for service, only to find that the local Enterprise office had no cars. This doesn't sound like a company with big scores in customer service from JD Power. And this isn't the first time something like this has happened. It seems that every experience with Enterprise consists of repeated apologies, followed by being escorted to the last car they have on the lot, which is frequently something bizarre like an extended Econoline van or a bare bones pickup truck.
How can a company that consistently offers this level of customer service still be successful? Cost leadership. If a cost cutting measure that adversely affects customer service saves more money than the potential loss of customers costs, then it's still probably a good way to go. In other words, if pissing me off because there are no cars costs Enterprise less than having a fleet of excess idle cars laying around so I can have my choice of rides, then I better be prepared for another cross-valley trek. Enterprise is a private company, so looking deeply into their operations is difficult. However, I've found evidence that Enterprise has mastered this cost leadership position, and this may have contributed to their explosive growth.
Enterprise has a customer service tracking method called 'Top Box', which tracks customer service with follow-up phone calls. If a customer is completely satisfied, then that customer is considered a 'repeat customer.' By obsessively tracking customer satisfaction, two things are accomplished. First, they can continually test different cost saving measures against customer service, to see how much that measure is impacting customer service. They can then adjust the measures accordingly, until the ratio between cost saving vs. customer service is optimized. The second benefit is that they can use top box as a marketing device that speaks to their obsession with customer service.
Another piece of evidence also point to a possible cost leadership strategy (besides my 15 mile trip across the valley). First, is a recent scandal that Enterprise found itself in back in 2006. Enterprise ordered a fleet of new cars built specifically without side airbags. The omission of side airbags saved Enterprise $11 million, and, unless a customer got into a serious accident, would not impact customer service in the least. The problem occured when the rental cars were put up for sale as full feature cars, and purchasers discovered the missing airbags.
Although I admit I'm jumping to conclusions, and there may be other types of strategies in place, I do so to make a point: A well managed cost leadership strategy is a sound strategy. Creativity can play a part in this as well, by creating programs that will prevent customer service from deteriorating under the cost leadership strategy. This means ideas that will be appreciated by customers, but won't cost much to Enterprise. The cost leadership strategy, although effective and profitable, is, by nature, constantly tempting fate. The company is always seeing how much they can get away with, and at some point they will misstep, as they did with the airbags. Creative and novel ideas can insulate Enterprise from the risk of backfire, so the smiling, apologizing salespeople aren't always scrambling to satisfy customers.
http://www.enterpriseholdings.com/